Re: old product version number - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Joel Stevenson
Subject Re: old product version number
Date
Msg-id a05001913b7625f9bcf67@[192.168.0.70]
Whole thread Raw
In response to old product version number  (Joel Stevenson <jstevenson@bearriver.com>)
List pgsql-jdbc
Looks like that change from 1.9 to 1.10 would do it!  Thanks.

At 1:31 AM +0900 6/30/01, Thomas O'Dowd wrote:
>Hmmm, it is likely that you are using an old driver... See the
>diffs at...
>

>http://www.ca.postgresql.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/interfaces/jdbc/org/postgresql/jdbc2/DatabaseMetaData.java.diff?r1=1.9&r2=1.10
>
>Looks like it used to return the version number of the driver... The current
>cvs driver works quite well and I imagine has fixed a number of problems
>since then.
>
>Tom.
>
>On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 08:54:35AM -0700, Joel Stevenson wrote:
>>
>>  >On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 11:29:15AM -0700, Joel Stevenson wrote:
>>  >>  I'm new to the list, so hello everybody.
>>  >>
>>  >>  Can anybody tell me why the DatabaseMetaData
>>  >>  getDatabaseProductVersion () method is returning 6.5.2 when I'm
>>  >>  running version 7.1?  The getDriverVersion correctly returns 7.0.
>>  >>  Can't find anything in the docs or archives.
>>  >
>>  >the source for that function executes the code "select version()".
>>  >What do you get when you psql into you database and execute this?
>>
>>  from psql:
>>  testdb=> select version();
>>                             version
>>  -----------------------------------------------------------
>>    PostgreSQL 7.1 on i586-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC 2.96
>>  (1 row)
>>
>>
>>  >Tom.
>>  >--
>>  >Thomas O'Dowd. - Nooping - http://nooper.com
>>  >tom@nooper.com - Testing - http://nooper.co.jp/labs
>>
>
>--
>Thomas O'Dowd. - Nooping - http://nooper.com
>tom@nooper.com - Testing - http://nooper.co.jp/labs


pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Joel Stevenson
Date:
Subject: Re: old product version number
Next
From: "Thomas O'Dowd"
Date:
Subject: Re: old product version number